Parties in Rohnert Park are a thing of the past

Parties in Rohnert Park are a thing of the past

Many Sonoma State University students let out a collective groan of frustration and disappointment on Sept. 8 when Rohnert Park city council adopted Ordinance No. 951, which repealed Chapter 9.48 “Alcohol Offense/Loud Parties”. This new ordinance comes with a couple of major changes to what constitutes a “party” and the consequences one can face if they are reported for a loud and unruly gathering.

Originally, for something to be deemed a party, it had to consist of 10 or more individuals, however, this has changed to a mere two people. With this more lax interpretation of a party, officers have more freedom to dish out warnings and fines. Being held responsible for throwing an illegal party has also become more harsh.

Before the new ordinance was adopted, first time offenders would receive a “120”. Essentially, a “120” is a warning. No fines come attached with a 120, however, a notice had to be visibly posted on the house or apartment, letting onlookers know that a gathering took place and intervention from the city was required as a result of a public nuisance. This notice had to remain visible on the residence for 120 days. Any additional “loud and unruly gatherings” that are reported after 120 days resulted in a fine that had to be paid by the responsible party. However, under the new ordinance “120s” have become “365s”, meaning that the 120 day “parole” period has switched to a year-long threat of fines.

This spells trouble for many college students. It’s no secret that party culture is an important part of the college experience to many, and more often than not it was college students who had to deal with the dreaded 120s. With frat boys living next to families, party houses in quiet suburbs, and no Greek Row to help compartmentalize some of the noise, it is looking like off-campus partying has become far more difficult.

Some may believe this is an attack on students, and under normal circumstances, it would be easy to argue that it is. Rohnert Park isn’t known as the “college friendly” city, and Seawolves can feel that, but perhaps stricter restrictions on partying is actually beneficial, not just to students but to the community as a whole.

With COVID-19 still rampaging in the country and a “Shelter in Place” order across the state, maybe it actually makes sense to crack down on parties in an attempt to stop the spread of this deadly virus. In theory, parties should be a thing of the past anyway. We aren’t supposed to be congregating in large groups, especially for something as frivolous as a party. According to healthline.com, college students have become COVID-19 “superspreaders,” partly due to all of the partying. In fact, a study by khn.org reported that college reopenings have added an average of 3,000 COVID cases per day to the nation’s total between mid-July and mid-September. So, perhaps if students shake off their initial petty disappointment in that “their partying lives are being totally ruined,” they may begin to see the potential health benefits for the community in stricter partying guidelines. With less people meeting up, there is less chance for the disease to spread.

Everyone should want a safer and healthier city, so under the extraordinary circumstances of COVID-19, these restrictions aren’t unreasonable. The only foreseeable problem is if the city decides to maintain these stricter new rules after the COVID-19 pandemic. While for some, this reality seems way off into the future, it is important to think about it.

The change in what determines a “party” seems problematic in a non-COVID society. It’s a stretch to say that two people constitute a party. A social gathering of two people sounds more like a movie night… or a date. On top of that, the “two person party system” gives officers far too much freedom to give out punishment. One noise complaint to a house with three people can bring about a mess of trouble for a homeowner or renter that frankly is unjust.

The city should also consider that many college students, who make up a solid bulk of the people receiving these noise complaints, don’t live here full-time. This means that a student might receive a “365” in Feb. but by May they’ve moved out and into a new house, leaving the landlord stuck with a notice on their house or apartment. Yep that’s correct, the 365 stays on the residence, not with the people living in them. So, not only does the punishment not really even affect the student, it hurts the actual owner of the property.

So, for now this new ordinance makes sense. We are living in a time like no other, so it is important that Rohnert Park takes steps to ensure the health and safety of its citizens, but when we get to a time where COVID-19 is a thing of the past, it will be important to reexamine how strict the city should be when it comes to parties.

Read More

Framed debates exclude critical thinking

Framed debates exclude critical thinking

After decades of fraudulent politics, outright treachery, deceit and corruption, the 2020 election is proof that no matter how bad things appear to be, it is highly likely that they will get worse if the American people continue to allow the system to be run by habitual liars, conmen, and hypocritical politicians.

Thanks to a lack of interest, herd mentality, and cognitive dissonance, many people remain blissfully unaware of the malfeasance at hand, as the corporate media mesmerizes the masses with slick programming and manipulative productions. Modern mainstream media has devolved into a cesspool of repetitive, carefully curated soundbites and relentless propaganda, perpetuating monumental myths that simply defy logic, and anyone capable of critical thinking is rightfully turned off by the entire process.

While the 24-hour news cycle offers an abundance of opportunity and potential, especially considering the number of hours that need to be filled, there never seems to be any time to explore topics in-depth. Producers cater to the lowest common denominator of attention spans, and hosts and guests alike are constantly hurried and told there’s no time to continue this conversation, only for the station to cut to a scandalous Kars4Kids commercial and a slew of trashy sales pitches.

The debate moderators guarantee that this time crunch carries into the debate format and complicates the process by distracting and redirecting the line of inquiry. Questions are selected that frame the debate and minimize independent perspectives, and artificial time constraints prevent any meaningful conversation from taking place.

The initial strategy is to limit the participants in the debate to the Republicans and Democrats, at the expense of all independent thinkers and at great detriment to our society. Third parties have been essentially blocked from the debate stage, and this is in direct contradiction to the spirit of revolution that founded this nation.

As George Washington wisely warned in his farewell address, “Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.”

John Adams said, “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties...”

After editing out all outside opinions and narrowing the field to candidates suitable to the economic interests that control this nation, the debates are severely hampered by the lack of relevant, intelligent questions that lead to discussions about policies that will dictate the quality of life for generations. Instead, superficial talking points and ad hominem attacks have taken the place of substantive, intellectual debate.

The only thing Vice President Mike Pence and Senator Kamala Harris could agree on during the debate is that they both hate Iran, and as is always the case with the candidates that are allowed to grace the debate stage this late in the game, perpetual war is not a topic to be discussed nor debated at all. Both sides posture for votes with no real talk about the bloated military budget that’s supporting this nation’s fairytale, house-of-cards economic system.

Pence demonstrated that he was so out of touch with reality that he couldn’t feel the fly on his head or the millions of people laughing at him around the world. His manner is so unnaturally calm and cold that it appeared the fly was debating whether or not she had landed on an acceptable corpse in which to lay her eggs.

Lies and distortions of reality are to be expected from the current administration, but Pence’s attempt to legitimize the last four years and the atrocious decisions that emanate from his and Trump’s administration is despicable. It is unconscionable that these people act the way they do and expect the public to respect them.

Money and power have trumped decency and respect, at great cost to the environment and humanity. This is the leadership that generations of greedy, aloof, and irresponsible citizens have manifest for the rest of us to deal with.

Unfortunately, the deck is stacked against the people, and we have much more to deal with than just a narcissistic commander-in-chief.

Senator Harris’ performance at the debate included her deceptive, cleverly worded promise to “decriminalize” and “expunge records” related to cannabis arrests, but this hollow proclamation falls on deaf ears, and millions of activists that worked to bring society to the brink of cannabis legalization are rightfully concerned that a Biden/Harris administration will not be good for the cause.

As a prosecutor, Harris is well-aware of how to split legal hairs, and decriminalization is a far cry from legalization. The facetious war on drugs provides a revenue stream to government agencies that is as addictive as the drugs they claim to fight. Neither party is willing to kill their golden goose, and Harris is signaling that nothing will change here, other than semantics.

Kamala Harris’ record as a prosecutor speaks for itself, as her office arrested and charged thousands of non-violent Bay Area citizens with cannabis charges during her time as district attorney, and her actions contributed to a disproportionate number of young minorities being imprisoned for victimless crimes.

As California’s Attorney General in 2014, Harris’ office oversaw an operation that sent Department of Justice agents, in coordination with secretive Major Crimes Task Force operatives, to conduct warrantless raids of cannabis gardens in Lake and Mendocino Counties. Identification of the state’s perpetrators and class-action lawsuits stopped these tactics, but the lesson to be learned from these examples is that Harris is more than willing to reinterpret laws as needed to fit her agenda. Harris laughs off questions about her cannabis record, but now she’s begging for votes from those that support criminal justice reform.

Status quo Joe’s support of the 1994 crime bill and his role in the country’s mass incarceration plague are no stark contrast with Trump’s Nixonian “law and order” mantra. It should be obvious at this point that there are no progressive horses in this race.

We are left with two condescending administrations that refuse to upset the moneyed interests that control the system, and while many will argue that it is best to vote for the lesser of two evils, that line of thinking has failed repeatedly, and the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.

If the nation is to cease being a debt-ridden, farce of a democracy, the two-party system needs to be abolished, Citizens United overturned, and term limits imposed for all public office.

Debate and conversation should not be limited to what satisfies advertisers and donors, and debates should be hosted and moderated by independent, nonpartisan organizations to make the process more inclusive and more relevant to the population.

Anything short of a complete overhaul of this failed experiment is merely kicking the can down the road at this point, and it is beyond time that society demands real change, social justice, and equitable treatment for everyone.


Read More

Profoundly unpresidential precedents

Profoundly unpresidential precedents

Over the course of this last week, President Donald Trump has had one very chaotic series of events take place. The insanity began with the first presidential debate of 2020 that occurred at Sheila and Eric Samson Pavilion in Cleveland, Ohio last Wednesday and culminated with him contracting the COVID-19 virus at the end of the week.

As many people have proclaimed, the debate was indisputably one of the ugliest to ever take place in United States history. With both Trump and Joe Biden interrupting each other every other sentence and not getting to talk about substantive policy, CNN’s Chris Cuomo illustrated the episode as a “shit show” and CNN’s Jake Tapper described it as, “...a hot mess inside a dumpster fire inside a train wreck.” In addition to the juvenile antics of the participants, the moderator, Chris Wallace, was clearly in place to prevent any real discussion of issues that might offend the puppet masters that brought us this illusion of an actual democratic election process.

With election day right around the corner, both candidates had their own way of going about their speaking parts. Biden was the first person to interrupt Trump, but after Biden started the ad hominem attacks, it seemed as if Trump took it as open season to go after Biden, no matter who’s turn it was to speak for the rest of the debate. He would begin saying, “no” or “wrong” and go on about his piece about the topic given by Wallace. Trump immediately tried to create a separation between the former Vice President and his left leaning base. Biden on the other hand, attempted to hammer Trump on the factors of his COVID-19 response and his inability to be presidential. Trump repeatedly called into question payments to the Biden family that resulted as a result of political pressure from the former Vice President, and Biden repeatedly refused to answer direct questioning from Trump, including about whether he would pack the Supreme Court with left-leaning judges.

With the attempt to win over votes in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Florida, Iowa, and Arizona, both Trump and Biden are trying to animate their own base and suppress their opponents in a battle to win over small segments of the electorate. As statistics indicate, people are disillusioned with the whole process, and many feel their vote is practically meaningless, as a result of the infiltration of money in politics, career politicians that lack relevance or the proper perspective to actually represent their constituents, gerry-mandering, the electoral college, and a monopolistic two-party system that prevents the separation of powers that are inherently necessary to a functioning democracy.

According to NBC News, after the debate was over, Biden had gained a commanding, national 14 point lead over Trump on the Wall Street Journal poll. Biden has a two to one vote by the public that he has the better temperament to be the president of the United States as reported by the Wall Street Journal poll. Now, Biden has Trump by 53% to 39% compared to his eight point lead in the previous poll before the debate took place. That being said, polls are virtually worthless in today’s political climate, and as any college student that passed a statistics course understands, these numbers are easily manipulated and distorted. Our poisonous political and media climate have exacerbated these realities, and today fake news and phony statistics are par for the course. The one thing that appears to be undeniable is that the system is rapidly losing credibility, and it will take a massive purge and overhaul of the entire apparatus for many to regain their trust in this broken down, racist, misogynistic beast of a government.

After the results of this debate, commission officials have decided that moving forward, they will be muting the candidates microphones to get a hold of the outrageous outbursts and interruptions. Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised that in our censor-prone, cancel-culture world, our prospective leaders will be openly silenced, but the need to mute microphones and direct questioning away from legitimate issues is symptomatic of an oppressive system that pretends to allow voters to decide, when the reality on the ground indicates that regardless of which party is in power, the policies change very little and the oppression remains the same.

As if written in by a twisted Saturday Night Live writer, two days after the debate, Trump and the First Lady, Melania Trump, tested positive for the COVID-19 virus. Chris Wallace claimed that Trump was not tested before the debate due to the fact that he showed up a bit late. According to NPR News, organizers relied on the honor system. Although he may be the president of the United States, he should follow all rules and guidelines during a national pandemic. Biden and other officials all tested negative prior to the debate.

Later that day, Trump held a ceremony in the White House’s Rose Garden to announce his nominee for the United States Supreme Court, that being Amy Coney Barrett. All of the guests packed into the outdoor space of the garden. There were many pictures taken there and inside the White House as well. The White House specifically has certain protocols regarding the COVID-19 virus for guests, officials, and different members of the press. Disturbingly, many of the guests were maskless. There have been eight confirmed people that have tested positive for COVID-19 after that ceremony including the president and the first lady. Later that night, Trump even flew over to Pennsylvania for an outdoor rally.

The ironic part of Trump contracting the virus is the fact that he actually mocked Biden for wearing a face mask to Tuesday’s presidential debate. Trump also claimed that he only needs to wear a mask when he feels that he should or needs to. “I don’t wear face masks like him,” Trump said to Biden. “Every time you see him he’s got a mask.”

Read More

Remembering Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of, if not the strongest woman in the United States government, died Sept. 18, 2020. She was 87 years old. Her time as a Supreme Court Justice was spent fighting for women’s rights and gender equality, and Ginsburg was someone that many women, young and old, looked up to as a strong individual who they could rely on to get the message across that women deserve better.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. in a press release issued by the Supreme Court, said of Justice Ginsburg, “Our Nation has lost a jurist of historic stature. We at the Supreme Court have lost a cherished colleague. Today we mourn, but with confidence that future generations will remember Ruth Bader Ginsburg as we knew her -- a tireless and resolute champion of justice.”

She was appointed as a Justice by President Bill Clinton in 1993, becoming the second woman in the Supreme Court, the first being Sandra Day O’Connor. She served 27 years in the Supreme Court, where she argued tirelessly for women’s rights and inspired many forms of change in the United States, including the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2009, making it easier for employees to win pay discrimination claims.

Her most known achievement on fighting gender discrimination came with her writing of the court’s opinion in United States v. Virginia 1996, which abolished the male-only admissions policy for the Virginia Military Institute, ruling it was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment. In Ledbetter v. Goodyear in 2007, a case in which Lilly Ledbetter filed a lawsuit against her employer for pay discrimination based on gender, the vote came out 5-4, stating that the statute of limitations starts to run at the time of every pay period, even if a woman did not know she was being paid less than her male co-worker until later. The result was absurd to Ginsburg, she was adamant in calling out the many problems with the reasoning, including that women often don’t know they are being paid less until after they receive their paycheck. She called on Congress to amend Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and thus undo the court’s decision. After the election of President Obama, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act became part of the nation’s law, with Ginsburg being credited with helping create it. Her efforts in supporting abortion rights, equal pay, and striking down any form of gender discrimination will continue even after her death because of the influence she had on so many people, especially women.

The day of her funeral, Rabbi Holzblatt, whose husband clerked for Justice Ginsburg from 2014 to 2015, spoke to the New York Times stating that R.B.G. “did not arrive like a lightning bolt, but rather through dogged persistence, all the days of her life...Real change, she said, enduring change, happens one step at a time.”

With her death, however, political battles have been ignited again. According to NPR, a few days before her death, Ginsburg told her granddaughter, Clara Spera, “My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.” Without her, President Trump can appoint yet another conservative to the Supreme Court, shifting the balance in the court to six to three. This would also allow more cases that the Republicans bring to the court to go through, including possibly the challenge against the Affordable Care Act that includes Obamacare.

Ironically, the incident displays the blatant hypocrisy that exists on both sides of the aisle. After the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016, President Obama attempted to appoint Merrick Garland to the court, but Republicans successfully stonewalled the appointment and argued that a president should not be allowed to appoint a new Superior Court Justice so close to an election. Today, both parties have gone back on their statement because one of their own is in office and they are both saying the opposite of what they argued just four years ago. This is hypocrisy at its finest, which we can expect from the US government as of late.

As a result, one of Ginsburg’s last wishes is being completely ignored for the selfish benefit of others, and there’s nothing she can do about it. While Trump and the republicans wish to replace her as quickly as possible, what they are likely to find out is that Justice Ginsburg’s shoes are next to impossible to fill.

Read More

Title IX training or triggering?

Title IX training or triggering?

Even as college-related activities at Sonoma State University have become virtual, Title IX training requirements still fall upon students to complete, in an effort to create a safer and less hostile environment with a main focus on sexual assault, discrimination and abuse. But what really is Title IX? And what has been changed from previous years when accessing this mandatory student training?

Title IX is labeled as a federal law that serves as a “powerful tool” for combating campus violence, and it was proposed in the Education Amendments Act of 1972. This program is enacted in many schools as training for students to learn about gender-bias and the dangers of sexual abuse. Title IX’s main message is that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance,” as stated by the U.S. Department of Education.

Many universities around the country use Title IX as a way to enhance knowledge about misconduct and discrimination in an educational institution, and these students are required to participate in a training course that varies depending on their accompanying state’s laws. This training is very much the same, focusing on avoiding sexual wrongdoing and discrimination.

Universities that participate in this training have their student’s take a comprehensive 30 to 40-minute training that consists of videos, stories, and ideas that relate to Title IX. This includes, but is not limited to, sexual assault in the workplace, sexual assault in educational setting, and sexual violence prevention. This training must be completed by all Sonoma State students by Sept. 30 to avoid a registration hold on their account for the following semester. Students who do not perform this task by Sept. 30 will not be able to register for classes in the upcoming semester until this training has been completed.

This training, however, contains very sensitive material involving sexual violence and assault, and to those with significant trauma, can bring up some horribly traumatic past emotions. Students who have suffered from sexual misconduct, and/or those who do not feel comfortable with this training, are asked to still partake in this exercise with a different and new alternative format. This year, Title IX dictates that students who “believe this training will be traumatic may request an alternative training form,” but this request must be filled out by Sept. 23 and will also involve a 45-minute meeting with Sonoma State’s Confidential Advocate.

This becomes a bit controversial, as the normal training is said to be strictly confidential, but to those who feel this training is too traumatic for them, a meeting with an advocate on alternative training strips students of their confidentiality. The university is offering little information about the opt-out process or what these alternatives include. For someone who has dealt with major sexual abuse, it may be hard to even want to discuss details and circumstances with a Sonoma State advocate, especially not knowing exactly what this process entails.

Prior to this virtual year swirling around due to the pandemic of COVID-19, Title IX allowed students an “opt-out” option, which allowed them to email the Office for the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination team, letting them know how this training will affect them in negative ways, including bringing up past trauma, and Title IX would give those students the allowance to opt-out while not leaving a hold on their registration.

In 2019, when the “opting out” option was available, it was an easier way for students who have trouble dealing with Title IX to not feel the repercussions of it, as well as it not hurting their school registration status. The OPHD would normally exempt a student from the training, and provide them with a PDF PowerPoint of key points in the online training as well as resources and support options that are available. This was created and became easy for the student to become familiar with these terms and ideas while still not being affected negatively by the training.

The opting out process provided relief for students who feel violated when discussing these sensitive topics and allowed them to express how they felt rather than share their real and personal experience, which can bring up negative emotions leading into a more negative state of mind.

Although the testing procedure is important, and free, for handling complaints that lead to sexual harassment, violence, or discrimination, it makes one wonder why the people who have suffered must partake in this training. Why did Title IX take away opting out? Does Title IX believe that students who have suffered sexual trauma will want to come forward with their advocate, or just take the pain and suffer through the original training?

Read More

Studying abroad: pandemic style

Studying abroad: pandemic style

Imagine this: you set off to a foreign country to study abroad, leaving your friends and family behind to see what this world has to offer. Months before you plan to return, a global pandemic sweeps the world by storm and infects almost every part of the world, including where you are. It sounds like Orson Welles is at it again, but as one might guess, this dismal nightmare became a reality for many international students this past semester.

Every year, universities across the globe send students overseas to pursue their education internationally. According to Sonoma State’s Center for International Education webpage, California State University International Programs (CSU IP) is the system-wide study abroad program for California State University students. Operating from within the CSU Chancellor’s Office and serving the 23 CSU campuses, CSU IP offers a wide variety of yearlong study abroad programs for undergraduate and graduate students. Some of which were enrolled in the Fall 2020 semester that came to a screeching halt.

As COVID-19 became more prevalent in the United States and as cases began to rise in other countries, CSU IP started to evacuate students from their host countries and required them to return to the U.S. or their home country shortly after the program suspension. This process began on Feb. 5, starting with the students studying abroad in China and ending their last evacuations as late as March 16 with students located in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Israel, Japan, Mexico, South Africa, and Taiwan.

According to the CSU IP’s current ‘Health and Safety Resources’ webpage, it is suggested to the students that they “Follow current events in your destination country and in the countries you plan to visit during your time abroad. By informing yourself and acting responsibly, you can help make your stay abroad healthy and safe.”

Aside from encouraging students to stay informed about world news before taking off to a foreign country, there is little mention of emergency preparedness plans. With that being said, staff and students alike were not prepared to face what seemed unimaginable and the consequences of the virus’s unraveling impacts.

Sonoma State student Julie Vargas, a current senior, spent the most recent school year (2019-2020) in Ghana (one of the last groups of students sent back to the U.S.). She explains that when trying to get answers from her superiors/coordinators, she was under the impression that she would remain in the country. Unfortunately, with how quickly the virus spread within five days, she was informed that she had to pack her bags and prepare to leave.

Vargas describes her last moments before flying home, “I thought I was safe in Ghana because at the time the travel advisory was at a level two, risk being moderate for travel conditions while all international travel was at a level three or four, meaning travel was highly not recommended. Because of this, I was very hesitant about the idea of leaving West Africa.” Vargas and many other students had no other choice but to listen to their coordinators and pack up their suitcases to head to an airport. Keep in mind that these students probably did not think a face mask covering would be a part of their “essentials” packing list.

Another SSU student, Jennifer Oliveros, who spent her time in Spain last school year, was also struck by the heartbreaking news as chaos broke out in Europe. “It was insane. Students were running down the halls in panic; people were out in the streets. It was pure chaos. All I could think about was how I was going to survive my plane flight to America as cases were rapidly increasing in Europe, and as thousands of people were trying to leave the country.”

When speaking to SSU’s International and Exchange program advisor, Hope Ortiz, she mentioned that this was not the first time the study abroad program has been faced with emergency situations. She even shared her own experience as a student. She spoke about when her study abroad experience was also disrupted while she was in Mexico, the epicenter for the H1N1 swine flu epidemic. She recognizes that her experience is somewhat different from COVID-19, as it is a global pandemic. Still, she can empathize with students on the level of panic that is felt in these situations.

Ortiz emphasizes that, “We are never going to send a student somewhere if it is not safe and if it ever becomes unsafe, we are going to do everything we can to make sure they are taken care of and that they get back safely. And I think this experience was a demonstration of that.” She continues, “of course things are going to happen that are out of our control, but the safety of the students is our number one priority. I think we definitely did the best we could, and now if something else happens in the future, we will be even better prepared for that because of what we learned from this experience.”

Thankfully the students mentioned above, along with other SSU students, were able to return to the states safely and are adjusting to being back. Although this process looks much different from it would have been, many are relieved to be back in a place with familiarity.

Ortiz additionally mentioned that the students she has spoken to about their travels, “... all still really appreciated the experience they got to have. Although they have mentioned they wish they could have completed their experience, they did appreciate the time they had there, learning about the local country and culture. It is relieving to know that some students still have all of what they experienced before all of this.”

This does pose several questions for those who were planning to study abroad. Are the potential health risks worth the investment? Will the unpredictability of COVID-19 interrupt the months of planning that takes place as early as a year prior to take off? Regardless of what has taken place in these last couple of months, the CSU IP is still marketing for and accepting students’ applications to study abroad for Fall 2021-2022. Those set on making international study a part of their college experience despite everything can still give the program a chance.

Read More

Not playing games with justice

Not playing games with justice

During such a tense moment in history as right now, with Black Lives Matter protests taking place all over the world, it is the perfect time for white sports fans to uplift Black voices, help share their message, and stand with them in solidarity and understanding. Instead, a lot of “fans” did quite the opposite.

Young--mostly white, male--sports fans took to social media to share their thoughts on the boycott and the Black Lives Matter movement. The comments were racist, negative, and overall, very unsupportive. President Trump responded that he didn’t like Lebron James and that he favored “Michael Jordan...he wasn’t political so people like him better.”

In reality, Jordan recently donated $100 million to racial justice causes and has spoken about “ingrained racism” in the United States, according to The Guardian.

Lebron James, an extremely popular basketball star of this generation and also an important political figure for the American youth, believes that he should express his right to share his thoughts on politics and he “Will definitely not shut up and dribble...I mean too much to society, too much to the youth, too much to so many kids who feel like they don’t have a way out,” James said.

Golden State Warriors’ player, Stephen Curry, has also been known to speak out about politics and the mistreatment of Black athletes. “People kind of try to put athletes and black athletes in a box, to say basketball is the only thing you can provide in the world,” Curry said. “This is not all that we’re about. It’s not all that we contribute to the world. There are guys that are going out, putting in resources and funds and raising awareness in the community.”

NBA commissioner Adam Silver embraced the players’ actions and said, “I’m incredibly proud of the players for using the platform they have on social media to speak out on issues...there is an enormous amount of racial tension in this country, enormous amount of social injustice, and I do see a role for this league in addressing those issues.”

After the postponement of several playoff games that undoubtedly captured the attention of many sports fans, NBA Players met Wednesday night to discuss the decision. Meetings among both players and the NBA’s Board of Governors took place on Thursday as the league and its union decided what to do about the rest of its season. Eventually, the NBA claims in a recent press release that “The players decided for themselves to continue playing. That included those who initially opposed the decision, such as LeBron James.” According to the report, The Lakers and Clippers initially both pushed to end the season during Wednesday’s meeting. Players were reportedly up late into the night discussing issues within the bubble. “That, combined with the time players had to cool down after Wednesday’s emotional meeting, seemed to lead to the budding consensus to restart the season,” said the NBA press release.

On Thursday, the NBA announced it would resume playoff games on Friday or Saturday. They said that they wished players could stay off the court until all police officers acted as if Black lives mattered, or “At least until sports fans across the country recognized the problem of systemic racism and took it upon themselves to solve it. But, then, who knows when the NBA would ever play again.”

Douglas Hartmann, a sociologist at the University of Minnesota and the author of Race, Culture, and the Revolt of the Black Athlete, claims that the aversion to supporting Black athletes in political discussion has been a “...pattern since the late 1960s. People try to protect this sacred space of sport. What doesn’t happen is engaging the protesters’ actual ideas about race and racism.”

How can we continue to allow Black Americans and athletes, who we claim to love and support, feel hopeless about the society they live in. White sports fans who love the NBA are supporting an organization made up of 75% Black athletes. But when their favorite players speak up about the injustice they face on a daily basis--even as wealthy, famous athletes--the majority of white fans resent them. It’s truly frightening to think about. White people who call themselves “fans” and who idolize these players, won’t support their favorite players when they are calling out for our help.

Read More

Let's not rush into things

Let's not rush into things

When one typically thinks of “Greek life” at Sonoma State University, what comes to mind? Is it the philanthropic endeavors Seawolves typically see on campus? Is it the awesome parties that have students chattering about them the next day? Maybe it’s even the rush process; talking to the active members, becoming a pledge, and the exciting journey of becoming a brother or sister. Well, in this new age of COVID-19 what students can typically expect out of Greek life is something entirely different. With a shift over to virtual learning and social distancing, fraternities and sororities alike are having to adapt to this strange new reality we are living in. The rush process will be completely online, there will be no in-person events, and, if proper safety protocols are followed, big parties will be a thing of the past. So with so much being taken away or changed some students are wondering: should I even rush this year?

For one thing, even though a litany of events are being cancelled, postponed, or altered to work online, members are still going to have to pay dues, money to the fraternity or sorority that goes toward funding these endeavors. Although many fraternities and sororities are cutting their dues, students may still have to pay hundreds of dollars to be a part of Greek life. Essentially, students will still have to pay, even though there are no in-person events. Formals, philanthropy events, even meetings will have to take place over an online forum or be cancelled entirely. Suddenly, what many people see as big bonuses to Greek life are stripped away. The money that would normally go toward these events may be cut out of dues entirely or repurposed for other virtual events and needs. Money also must be paid to the national chapter of many of the fraternities and sororities, meaning that students will simply be paying for being in the fraternity or sorority. Without these events, is forking over hundreds of hard earned dollars worth the cost?

Another important factor of Greek life, to some, is the partying. It’s no secret that many college students like to go out and have a good time, and “frat parties” are something that quickly comes to mind. However, with over 6 million cases of COVID-19 in the United States, massive social gatherings like those are extremely dangerous. According to the NY Times, UC Berkeley had 47 cases of COVID-19 that directly linked to fraternity and sorority events within just one week. At the University of Washington, 15 out of 25 fraternity houses hosting students over the summer suffered a coronavirus outbreak. Clearly, the big gatherings that sororities and fraternities are known for pose a threat to the health of the community. Luckily, Sonoma State has informed chapters that getting caught partying with their Greek letters can result in getting kicked off campus. This severe punishment will hopefully act as a deterrent, keeping the community safe.

Hopefully, with the threat of removal, parties remain non-existent for the wellbeing of students, however, this is a huge blow to students who were hoping that joining a fraternity or sorority could help get them into the party scene.

While it may be looking bleak for those still on the fence about rushing, it isn’t all bad news. In fact, in the isolated environment COVID-19 has put us in, now may be the best time for some students to rush.

Without in-person classes and on campus events, getting to socialize and meet members of the Seawolf community is difficult. Incoming freshmen are at an especially difficult spot as, for some, they are at a university where they truly do not know anybody. Many students are living at home, far away from fellow Seawolves, making it hard to meet others. It can seem like a daunting task to actually manage to interact with fellow students. Luckily, joining Greek life gives one the opportunity to make connections that can last a lifetime. Several members of sororities and fraternities rave about how joining Greek life connected them to some of their best friends. These are potential connections for life. So, when the time comes and students are once again allowed on campus and social distancing is a thing of the past, members will already have a brotherhood or sisterhood of friendly faces to see. Until then, at the very least, they will have a group of people to talk to and get advice from. Even without face-to-face learning, on-campus living, or in-person events, Greek life makes it possible to meet new and exciting people that can offer support, advice, and friendship.

Not only does it have a social benefit, Greek life can also be a feather on a Seawolf’s resume cap. Working in executive positions within Greek life and helping execute philanthropy events all have the potential to show leadership to an employee. Many incoming freshmen have minimal work experience, so perhaps joining Greek life can help give them an edge in the competitive job environment.

So, even though Greek life will be totally different from anything done before in the past, perhaps it is worth the time to check it out. Everything will be over an online forum, major occasions like formals; philanthropy endeavors; and rush events will be cancelled or altered, students will still have to pay dues, and parties will be scarce; however, sometimes that social connection makes it all worth it. As isolated as many students are beginning to feel, maybe now more than ever, rush is looking like a great option.

Read More

Alice in Wonderland 2020: We're all mad here

Alice in Wonderland 2020: We're all mad here

The list of unfathomable events that have already occurred in 2020 is mind-boggling proof that truth is stranger than fiction. These are undoubtedly historic, unprecedented times, and to many it feels like we are living in a bad dystopian movie.

While it is easy to get caught up in the mass hysteria, being paralyzed by fear is detrimental to emotional, mental, and physical well-being. In times like these, it is advisable to have an appropriate level of apprehension, regardless of the media hype and politicization of current events.

The table is set for a wild ride this fall, and while it may seem an insurmountable task to overcome these obstacles, as Alice observed on her adventure, “The only way to achieve the impossible is to believe it is possible.”

With political propaganda and authoritarian dictates difficult to distinguish from fact and science, it is helpful to avoid groupthink and herd mentality. Like Mark Twain said, “Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform.”

There is no shortage of controversy to explore in 2020. To recap some lowlights of this rollercoaster year:

The President of the United States was impeached, only the third such occurrence in the history of the nation.

Geopolitical turmoil and saber rattling is at full throttle, and the likelihood of an all-out war or series of conflicts is all but guaranteed given the current economic and political climate.

Medical authorities declared a worldwide pandemic in March. More than 800,000 are reported dead around the globe, and contradictory guidance from a litany of supposed experts has contributed to a delirium more contagious than the virus itself.

Schools and universities were shut down around the nation. As a result of campus closures and online curriculums, colleges are facing catastrophic budget deficits, and millions of families are suddenly without their government-sponsored and property tax-funded babysitting service.

Global lockdowns restricted movement across the majority of cities, states, and countries around the world, and bans are still in place that limit Americans’ freedom to travel internationally.

The concept of fractional reserve banking was quietly nixed for a limitless zero percent free-for-all for the blessed few organizations with access to the Fed window. Global financial and equity markets experienced monumental volatility, with the worst losses since the Great Depression. Oil prices traded negative, and gold topped $2,000/ounce, but according to the financial wizards running the show, there’s nothing to see here folks.

Last year at this time, it was a misdemeanor crime in many states to cover your face in public, and today it is mandated and acceptable to enter a store, even a bank, with a facial covering that can be a complete disguise. While theoretically understandable, this facilitates and encourages criminal activity by allowing perpetrators to act without fear of reprisal, and the riots this summer capitalized on this convenience.

Widespread protests in cities around the country following the deaths of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor catalyzed cities to defund police departments. The Black Lives Matter movement is combining the peaceful tradition and knowledge of Martin Luther King, Jr. with the wit, intellect, and passion of Malcolm X to bring about effective change.

The use of high-tech surveillance to monitor these protests should come as no surprise to those familiar with the tactics used by the FBI to silence protestors with COINTELPRO operations, and the heavy-handed enforcement from riot police and federal agents equipped with pepper spray, tear gas, and militarized equipment is reminiscent of the 1968 riots at the Democratic National Convention.

Chicago police claim they are investigating what they describe as rogue transmissions, as live police radio from Chicago in June, while the Magnificent Mile was being looted, captured what appeared to be a law enforcement officer instructing other units to “stand down...let it burn,” with the repeated mantra of “officer safety first...blue lives matter most.” Several times, Mayor Lightfoot was referred to as “Beetlejuice” and was repeatedly called out for her decisions regarding the civil unrest.

Angst and frustration led to never-before-seen levels of looting and rioting in shopping districts across the country. Videos abound with highlights of the absolute insanity of the situation. Billions of dollars in property damage and lost merchandise are but the tip of the iceberg, as many retail establishments will close, move, or transition to online sales in order to protect assets, and this will inevitably result in fewer jobs, lower rents, and less sales tax collected.

Commercial real estate declines, loss of sales tax revenue, and budgetary concerns will take time to manifest, but strains are already being seen. The city of Willits, Calif. is threatening to dissolve if a sales tax increase is not passed.

If politicians are not successful securing relief to bail out cities and states that are in danger of insolvency, fiscal insufficiencies will lead to municipal bankruptcies that have the potential to devastate communities as defaults spread to pension liabilities.

All this chaos and insanity conveniently allowed the Democratic National Committee to brush aside the 2020 election campaign. It would be an interesting social experiment to have held competing rallies in cities across the country for Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden to see where the momentum and voting power really lies.

This surreal election cycle threatens to tear the country apart, as both sides are accusing the other of cheating and rigging the election. The best that can possibly come out of such lack of civility is that the American people recognize the system for what it truly is and demand real change.

2020 is going down in history as a year of social revolution and transformation, and society has the potential to take a great leap forward if fear does not block the path.

The opportunity is presenting itself for humanity to forge a compassionate future, but the road to freedom is not without strife, and many people find it easier to think like the Cheshire Cat and say, “I never get involved in politics,” but society is suffering from lack of interest and involvement because, as Plato warned, “The price of apathy toward public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

Read More

Fear and loathing COVID-1984

The public is being bombarded with wall-to-wall coverage of the coronavirus crisis from most media outlets, and while the ubiquitous coverage is paralyzing critical thinking skills, major stories are being glossed over by the media or completely omitted altogether.

The intentional yo-yo style delivery of information and inconsistent messaging from government leaders and talking heads exacerbates the divisive political climate and serves to confuse the masses. The result of incomplete and contradictory reporting is chaos and civil unrest, and these are key elements that enable massive military spending and confiscation of civil liberties.

A running count of cases and deaths published daily stokes flames of fear, while irresponsible reporting fills pages of print with information that is obsolete before it is published, and irrelevant stories serve to block any meaningful exploration or discussion of topics that counter the official narrative. 

The journalism industry has been gutted in recent years by the consolidation and conglomeration of the field, and the economic shock from the coronavirus may be the final nail in the coffin for many organizations. It is now easier than ever to control narratives, as media organizations are swallowed up by huge conglomerates, and the key to narrative control is through the social media platforms.  

While the Constitution guarantees free speech, terms of service typically do not, and the use of corporate power to silence critics is the hallmark of a plutocracy.  

Billions around the globe are affected by shelter-in-place orders, and fear of coronavirus infection has led the majority of the population to willingly submit to governmental demands.  On the surface, people are acting in the interest of humanity by voluntarily complying, but a dangerous precedent is being set that jeopardizes democracy. 

Society has devolved from a time when Benjamin Franklin said, “Those willing to give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security,” and Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s proclamation that “The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself” is curiously absent from the current lexicon.

Hunter S. Thompson’s prescient observation after 9/11 remains relevant today: “We are turning into a nation of whimpering slaves to Fear—fear of war, fear of poverty, fear of random terrorism, fear of getting downsized or fired because of the plunging economy, fear of getting evicted for bad debts or suddenly getting locked up in a military detention camp on vague charges of being a terrorist sympathizer.” The bogeyman has changed, but the tactics remain the same.

The comparisons of the COVID-19 pandemic and 9/11 are all over the news media now, headlines from thousands of articles seen in the likes of Business Insider, Fortune, Forbes, Vanity Fair, and others, in addition to a plethora of reports from the alphabet soup of news stations on radio and television, are all comparing the current crisis to 9/11.  

Other than the barrage of relentless propaganda, one of the few actual similarities between the two events appears to be the public’s willingness to trade a false sense of security in exchange for their civil liberties. The physical events of 9/11 were over in hours, but the rights that were taken away by the PATRIOT ACT have never been restored, with annual congressional renewals that receive minimal media attention.

With the current crisis, the First Amendment, specifically the “right to peaceably assemble,” is being circumvented by leaders declaring emergency powers, and even if a group was inclined to “petition the Government for redress of grievances,” shelter-in-place orders provide an official excuse to deny citizens their constitutional rights. 

The ability to protest and organize is a vital component of a functioning democracy, and these rights are critical in normal times, especially so given the current context, amidst an on-going emergency and in the middle of a highly contested election cycle.

The coronavirus is providing a perfect cover to pass legislation that has been long-desired by corporate elements and political leaders on both sides of the aisle. News that would be front-page headlines with in-depth journalistic investigations in a normal environment is being completely sidelined or buried in articles, and the lack of media coverage prevents the public from recognizing what is occurring while they are sheltered in their homes. 

The deregulation agenda is being implemented full-force during the crisis, and the banking industry managed to sneak language into the bail-out bill that the financial industry has long fought for.  Trump expanded Environmental Protection Act deregulation, is actively dismantling the Affordable Care Act, reducing funding for public health and infectious disease programs such as the Centers for Disease Control, and benefits provided to the neediest communities are being slashed.

The nationalization of private capital markets by the Federal Reserve can not be understated, profits have officially been privatized while all substantial losses are now subsidized and backed by taxpayer funds. If the average citizen understood exactly what is transpiring, a revolution would be well underway. 

Reducing reserve requirements to zero is an incredible shift in policy that received very little mention in the press, but this is a cataclysmic decision that can only result in a massive dollar bubble that leads to inflation at best and violent hyperinflation as a serious possibility, especially with the Fed cutting interest rates to zero and guaranteeing QE infinity to prop up the house of cards. 

The notion of a free financial market is a thing of the past, as rules designed to preserve the integrity of the markets are rewritten and seemingly long-forgotten. While the treasury is essentially being looted by financial masterminds that claim to be stabilizing the system, global equity markets are being reset by a self-induced shock and awe attack. 

Time will tell which fortunate individuals and organizations pick up the pieces after the controlled demolition of the global economic system is complete. Commercial properties and assets will be purchased at pennies on the dollar by well-capitalized firms backed by Treasury support, while small and medium businesses are likely to be wiped out in incredible numbers. The domino effects of the shutdown will trickle for years and the reverberations will be felt across industries.

Researchers will soon be left to follow the motive, and most importantly, the money, to determine who benefits from this unprecedented economic upheaval.

The efficacy of the social distancing guidelines and shelter-in-place orders, now in effect for approximately one month for most of the U.S., is an argument best left for those qualified to gather and interpret independent data, but the fact that the virus is being used by elected representatives to trample constitutionally protected rights and consolidate power is a threat to democracies around the globe.   

Power is being consolidated wholesale across the world, and governments are betting that humanity will bow down and relinquish digital and personal privacy to the state. The fact that every person that chooses to carry a smartphone is bugging themself with a tracking and listening device is an open secret, but recent announcements that Google, Facebook, and Apple are providing location data and contact tracing capabilities to government agencies is alarming.  GPS tracking combined with automatic license plate readers allows government agencies to document an individual’s whereabouts and compile information that can be used in a court of law to deny freedom and facilitate prosecutorial actions.

 Democratic Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear said the state will record license plate information from vehicles in parking lots on Easter Sunday so that officials can follow up about ordered 14-day self-quarantines for all that attend public events. 

Federal U.S. District Judge Justin Walker overruled Kentucky’s attempt to ban Easter services, including drive-in ceremonies that were observing social distancing guidelines.  Judge Walker wrote a scathing 20-page opinion in which he lambasted the state’s attempt to “criminalize communal Easter celebrations” and said the case is one he “never expected to see outside of a dystopian novel.”

A nation physically, as well as politically, divided and practically immobilized by fear of what Trump calls an “invisible enemy,” is easily led down an authoritarian path with a highly centralized economic and social structure.

While some argue that nobody could have envisioned a scenario like we are currently facing, the evidence suggests that not only has the U.S. and a multitude of NGO’s planned for much worse, but a scenario was simulated just months ago that eerily parallels the current situation.

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in coordination with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum, hosted Event 201 in October of 2019, a Global Pandemic Exercise in which a virus, coincidentally named CoV-19 in the exercise, kills 65 million people. The round table simulation featured organizations that are acting and responding today precisely as they did during the exercise

At some point, blowback is inevitable, as people begin to wake up to the authoritarian course of actions that are occurring. Hunger, lack of resources, and financial hardships are prime motivators, and they are known to cause people to act unpredictably. Society is facing unprecedented levels of all three across spectrums of the population that would have thought the ideas incomprehensible just months ago.

While it is still too early to tell what exactly is going on, and it is completely understandable that people are complying with orders out of an abundance of caution to protect humanity, Albert Camus’ observation that “The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants” should be kept in mind.

Most college students have never lived in times as strange as these, and while the future may look bleak for soon-to-be graduates that will be competing with the 40 million newly unemployed looking for work, it is important to stay focused and keep a positive mindset.  Humanity will be well-served if students recognize that this is a pivotal moment in which those with the courage to stand up and lead ethically and responsibly have the opportunity to reverse the current trajectory and make monumental changes to social structures and methods of governance.

Once a Seawolf, always a Seawolf: mourning postponed graduation

For graduating seniors, this is no doubt the strangest and hardest time of their lives. It is hard to comprehend that students have worked so hard the past four years and won’t be able to cross the stage at Green Music Center this May. We have lost our senior events, time with our beloved professors and friends, and the last two months of our youth. Many individual’s minds are racing and hearts are full of sadness because we have
to let go of our schooling experiences early. When the university sent notice that classes would be held online
for the remainder of the semester, the shock and confusion did not set in for most until recently. It wasn’t Zoom courses that made this so terrible, but the fact that we might not see classmates, acquaintances, friends, and professors ever again. The connections we made the past four years are gone. We are left with no celebrations, no goodbyes, and no chances to sit in a classroom as a student for the final time. Since
move-in day freshman year, everyone has dreamed about the day they would cross the stage and make family, friends, and professors proud. Not to say they aren’t proud, but that moment of recognition is likely gone. Even though the graduation ceremony is not a crucial celebration for everyone, it is often one of the only events that all close family members will try to attend, regardless of their location and schedule. So many college graduates are excited to see long distance friends and family during this special day, and come together to celebrate their successes. College students are under an immense amount of stress and sometimes feel as if they are not getting the credit they deserve for their hard work. A commencement ceremony is exactly what many people need to round out their college experience. Although it is understandable that health concerns take priority over fond memories, it does not make it easier to accept the loss. The Covid-19 virus has taken a huge toll on our emotional health and with isolation, it seems like the world is crashing down. The worst part is, we are powerless. We can not control the spread of this virus or when it will vanish. All we can do is hope for the best, but at this point, it is hard to see the light at the end of
the tunnel. Any angry or upset feelings are valid and relatable to almost every single college senior out
there. Anyone who tries to tell us our sadness is blown out of proportion does not understand the emotional toll this has taken and will continue to take on our lives. The good news is that we are young and have our lives ahead of us. Things will get better; that is inevitable. Maybe not right away, but we will find a way to overcome this disappointment. We will succeed and make this world a better place. We will pursue our
dreams and we will get to where we ultimately want to be. At a time like this, it is important to lean on friends and family. Being isolated makes it easier to sink into depression. Making jokes, playing games, being around people is the only thing that will get us through these tough times. Of course, it is important to practice social distancing, but we have to make sure we don’t disappear into the abyss. Take time out of our days to call,
send a good morning text, and just check on each other. Spread love and positivity because that is all we can do. It is okay to mourn and be sad.. In the absence of a graduation ceremony, spreading uplifting energy to each other will help. This world needs social connection, even if it is through texts and phone calls. We will prevail and we will show this world what we are made of. There is nothing we can’t do. Keep working hard and finish the semester off strong. Once a Seawolf, always a Seawolf.

Coronavirus cases increase, along with health anxiety and isolation boredom

Back in January, it seemed like 2020 was meant to be everyone’s year, but after a turbulent start, citizens of the world are finding themselves in the midst of a global health pan- demic. The coronavirus is often being compared to a more severe form of the flu, and with reports from Italy of nearly 800 deaths in one day, resources and supplies being low and an overall feel- ing of panic, The United States is preparing for a peak of unwell patients in hospitals. For colleges, this can mean many things: most universities have shut their doors and moved to online instruction for the remainder of the semester to hopefully slow the spread of the virus. According to journal- ism website ED Source, these closures have impacted 170,000 college students thus far.

Sonoma State University first announced that classes would continue online during spring break,causing a mixed reaction from students. Regard- less, doing so is safest for every- one’s health, since coronavirus is now reported to live in the air for up to 3 hours, accord- ing to CNN. When California first went into lockdown, most residents were anxious and confused. The term social distancing was then brought up, prompting even more questions. This did not stop people from continuing their vacations, get-togethers, and most notably, their spring break.

A plethora of news sources reported on the city of Miami being flooded with college-age spring breakers with no intention of social distancing. The city is known for its over-the-top nightlife, and is a popular desti- nation for parties and vacations.

Memes spread on social media discussing low ticket prices, and suggesting that it is the best time to travel, since flights are so cheap and there are not many people in airports. Even though to some these events and posts might be lighthearted and fun- ny, young people, especially those who are healthy with no history of underlying medical conditions, might have little to no symptoms if they get sick, but will continue to spread the virus to others. As of Monday Florida has 1,000 active cases of the virus according to WSVN, with Miami being a hotspot.

Just because a young, healthy person is not visibly ill does not mean that that they can’t pass it to others who might contract a severe or even fatal case. This goes for our own larger college community, too. Many staff and students are immuno-compromised, and with such cramped classrooms even a small college like SSU could easily become a breed- ing ground for the virus. These worries have added even more stress to college students, lead- ing to anxiety surrounding their health and hygiene and dis- appointment due to canceled events like commencement.

Students and young people have also been expressing their boredom while stuck at home- -many were forced to return to their parent’s residence which can cause tension and family related stress. Many find peace in distractions like going out and seeing friends, and these things are also not suggested, there- fore leaving most people alone with little to do. Sitting around all day can lead to even more anxiety--social media and news

outlets are constantly popping out stories about the virus and its death toll. With nothing else to do, individuals might feel consumed by the madness.

Though it is frustrating that such large events are canceled or being moved back, doing so will be beneficial for all. Con- certs, festivals, shows and other affairs that involve large crowds could easily spread coronavirus. Being stuck at home is not fun for most, but has its purpose. Everyone should remember that the shelter in place exists for a reason: to keep Americans safe and isolated, and to hopefully slow the spread of the virus so that hospitals are not over- whelmed with patients. Even though things seem unreal right now, California is expecting its peak in the upcoming weeks, and what comes up must come down. People can manage their stress through things likedigital entertainment, exercise, creativity, spending time with family, and picking up new hobbies.

Turning off most social media or news notifications can be beneficial to one’s stress levels, as well as focusing on the positive and good things happening in the world. Some say that what we consume and surround ourselves with is what we become--constant news updates and clickbait articles will only worsen anxiety, and though it’s easier said than done, trying to limit stressors like the news will positively impact your quarantine experience. The world has seen sickness and seen health, and we have survived 100% of our toughest, scariest days, and will continue to do so, even with the uncertainty of the virus.

Alcohol being served on campus prevents drunk driving and other incidents

Sonoma State University has a plethora of selling points. The university’s Green Music Center is one that is brought up quite often, the small class size draws in those who actually want to get to know their professors, but one of the nicest things about Sonoma State is that we are in the heart of wine country. Sonoma County is known for its top of the line wineries and beautiful vineyards, and Seawolves, above the age of 21, are lucky enough to be on a campus that is able to actually serve them a glass.

Sonoma State is a “wet” school, meaning that students are able to purchase, consume, and store alcohol on campus. Now for some, this may cause concern. Students and parents alike fear the horror stories they are told of drunk driving accidents, alcohol poisoning on college campuses, and disastrous parties, so the fact that Sonoma State doesn’t have a hard ban on alcohol can seem as though the university promotes and encourages a culture of irresponsible drinking, however this is not the case. 

Having a “dry” campus, one that has a ban on alcohol, does not guarantee the safety of its students. In fact according to a study done by Project Know, dry campuses reported more liquor arrests on average than wet campuses, 19 per 1000 students as opposed to 16.

“The top five schools for liquor related arrests arrests included three dry campuses,” said Project Know’s website.

A dry campus clearly isn’t a solution to alcohol related issues and could actually even amplify the situation. Students who would just sit in their dorm and have a beer are instead forced to go outside of the campus to bars or parties where binge drinking is prevalent. Just because they can’t get it on campus doesn’t mean students won’t be able to find a way— one that could be even more dangerous than they were intentionally planning.

George Koob, director of the National Institute of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse told TIME magazine, “That’s the whack-a-mole concern, and it’s a real one if other prevention programs are not implemented.”

At Sonoma State, if a 21 year old student decides they want to have a glass of wine in their room or go out to eat on campus and grab a beer, they have that option. Now, this is not just some lawless land where the alcohol freely flows at every venue for anyone who is lined up. The university has put in place several rules that keep its student body safe while also letting them enjoy alcohol is a safe space.

Food venues on campus like Lobos, the Wine Spectator building, and even the Green Music Center all serve alcohol, however there are drink limits in place to ensure that patrons drink responsibly. Workers in orientation are taught about the “stoplight” method. When a student first walks in they are green, meaning they are totally unimpaired and can start drinking. At the yellow stage, employees are encouraged to offer food to the patron and suggest they switch to water. Finally at the red stage, the student is cut off from alcohol to prevent anything dangerous from going on. With a wary staff, it is nearly impossible to binge drink but responsible students can get a drink before safely walking back to their dorm.

Another measure Culinary Services has put in place to prevent students from taking advantage of their privilege is by having employees at venues that serve alcohol attend a mandatory training on how to catch fake ID’s, lead by Detective Jon Kempf of Rohnert Park Public Safety. It is no secret that some underage students want to get their hands on alcohol, but Sonoma State puts in the effort to ensure this doesn’t happen on campus. These trainings, paired with the drink limits help protect students from the dangers of binge drinking while allowing them the freedom to enjoy a drink on the school’s beautiful campus.

Sonoma State also allows students over the age of 21 to keep alcohol in their dorms. These students now don’t have to worry about driving out, drinking, and then driving home. Instead, they can relax and not worry about possibly driving while impaired, hurting themselves or others. Of course, there are rules when it comes to from, which is for the best. According to Sonoma State’s website dorms should have “..one drink serving open for every person living over the age of 21 in the dorm.” It should also not be in view from outside of the apartment. This keeps underaged students from taking advantage of the system by getting drinks from older students, since only one drink can be open at a time within the dorm, and keeps the campus looking beautiful for visitors.

With enrollment dropping, Sonoma State needs every edge it can to entice students to come. Being able to serve alcohol on campus, especially on a campus situated so close to some of the greatest wine in the United States, is certainly a big plus. Students are grateful to be able to enjoy an alcoholic beverage on campus and the safety of being able to walk back to their dorm.

Active shooter drills can cause distress in college students

Teachers’ unions are calling for an end to active shooter drills at schools that involve students, especially those that are unannounced and contain role-playing exercises that lead participants to believe the situation is real. These drills come in response to a series of mass shootings perpetrated over the last several years, and fears that persist, whether real or imaginary, are causing districts to overreact and allow the security industry to escalate the use of live drills, at a great cost to participants, taxpayers, and private institutions.

TheTrace.org reported that “a 2018 contract for Alisal Union County School District showed a total cost of $32,100 for three years of services” associated with live-action drills. According to NPR, the school security industry is worth $3 billion a year, so there are clear financial incentives to continue and expand active shooter drills, but the cost to students’ mental health must be considered.

The drills, while possibly offering the advantage of preparedness, are similar to the abundance of TSA agents at airports and uniformed security personnel at public events, merely an illusion of security more than actual defense, and the negative impacts, including lost instruction time, emotional distress to participants, and the price paid for the activity, far outweigh the gains.

Most school shooters are students, and the unions’ complaint accurately notes that performing drills where future potential perpetrators are participating is essentially defeating the purpose.

Statistically, based on numbers provided by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI, the odds of being involved in an active shooter situation at a school are approximately one in 4.8 million. The National Safety Council reports that a person is more than 1,300 times more likely to die from choking on food, yet there are no choking preparedness drills, and one is seven times more likely to be struck by lightning, but there is no widespread concern, as the chance is so remotely slim. 

Media hype and the use of fear as a motivating tactic helped create an environment where school districts are pressured to minimize liability by including expensive drills that definitely benefit the industry providing them, however, there are serious doubts from participants about the efficacy of the exercises.

If government officials and school administrators really want to tackle the issue of school shootings, the root causes of these instances must be addressed. Gun control is an omnipresent hot topic, and there is no easy solution, but suffice it to say something must be done. There are, however, other issues that must be dealt with, or the weapon will change and the pattern of violence will remain the same.

Following the economic meltdown of 2008, the perception of an unjust, broken society that favors the rich at the expense of all others has led to increased levels of frustration, depression, and associated mental health issues. 

Healthcare is the leading cause of financial ruin in the United States, and approximately 530,000 families are forced into bankruptcy by medical bills each year, as reported by the American Journal of Public Health. The US ranks last in healthcare quality and access among comparable nations, according to the Kaiser Foundation, and disease burden is substantially higher than all other developed nations.   

The opioid epidemic and the ubiquitous over-prescribing of antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, only exacerbate the mental health problems society is facing. The American Psychological Association, APA, reports that 12.7% of the population over age 12 take anti-depressants, equating to more than 41.5 million people. More than 191 million opioid prescriptions were written in 2017, as reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These combine to destabilize the population while masking the real issues and unwittingly contributing to the nation’s addiction epidemic.

One of the elephants in the room that must be dealt with is the War on Drugs that incarcerates mental health patients suffering from addiction, removes non-violent criminal offenders from their families and enslaves them in privately-owned corporate prisons, and takes away grant and student loan money from all college students convicted of a drug charge. These actions are patently designed to jeopardize democracy by restricting access to higher education and disenfranchising millions in the process.

The cannibalistic capitalist financial system that demands mathematically impossible perpetual growth from a finite planet is destroying the ecosystem, altering the climate, and prohibiting many from providing a liveable income for their families. The erratic economic landscape leaves high school and college graduates in the position of competing with their parents for a limited supply of sustainable, good-paying jobs. Financial frustration, loss of hope, and the stress of not knowing what to do can feel like insurmountable obstacles for the emotionally vulnerable.

A cursory glance at the newly proposed federal budget highlights the ideological struggles dividing the country and illustrates the nation’s priorities. President Trump’s proposal for 2020 includes a 10% reduction in education spending, dropping the total to $64 billion, all the while proposing that the military budget be increased $22 billion to a gargantuan $738 billion, equalling more than the next seven nations combined. The message being sent to U.S. citizens and the rest of the world is that war and violence are superior to intellect and education. 

The Watson Institute of International and Public Affairs at Brown University found that “U.S. federal spending on the current wars would have led to at least 1.4 million more jobs had the money been invested instead in education, health care, and clean energy.” The study concluded that war spending increased interest rates for consumers and homeowners because it was financed by debt.

It is not surprising that an economy built on war and the security industry demands that all school districts pay thousands of dollars for drills into the corporate war machine to keep the house of cards intact, but the teachers’ unions coming together demanding change could alter the narrative. A cooperative effort that recognizes the importance of common sense, compassion, dignity, and respect becoming integral aspects of our national character is the first step in overcoming senseless violence and the divide and conquer strategy that politicians and the corporate media have successfully waged against the people. Together, we can achieve peace and prosperity, but it will take courage to look past the misdirection, distractions, and propaganda. 



Meme Culture: the global infectant we should actually be concerned about

In the last 20 years alone, the establishment of contemporary global culture has seen dramatic acceleration in an ever digitized, technologically entrenched world. Yet, while culture on a global scale has certainly thrived alongside widespread internet use, the value of borderless interconnectivity that the internet brings to the table has, in reality, enabled countless users to starve others, and themselves, of the necessary attention--and appropriate response--toward people enduring ongoing crises and tragedies worldwide. Indeed, the inherent free-to-roam aspect of the internet has seen users blindly portion-controlling treatment of an issue that they deem fit, also identifiable as everything wrong with the internet mainstay at work: “meme culture.” 

Kara Rogers, a member of the National Association of Science Writers since 2009 and writer for Encyclopedia Britannica, says that, “Within a culture, memes can take a variety of forms, such as an idea, a skill, a behaviour, a phrase, or a particular fashion. The replication and transmission of a meme occurs when one person copies a unit of cultural information compromising a meme from another person,” Rogers continued, “and those memes that are most successful in being copied and transmitted become the most prevalent within a culture,” according to her article for Britannica.

Within precisely what Rogers discerns to be the “successful” catalyst behind memes, internet users--college students included--prioritizing the ability to copy and transmit cultural aspects of memes often brutally undermines the realities facing people on a daily basis within said crises and tragedies. This aspect is still ingrained well across meme culture to this day. In fact, the most prime, recent example arises in the case of the Wuhan coronavirus. 

Reaching initial outbreak in mainland China on Dec. 1, 2019, the coronavirus--and those infected, especially those of Chinese ancestry or descent--has received comparable treatment online as Ebola and the people of Africa enduring the outbreak therein just several years ago.  

Yet, as parodying the suffering endured by any cultural group is never ‘okay’ nor excusable, the looming activity of meme culture--with no direct blame attributed to any one group, thread, or person due to the ‘masked’ value of the internet--has egregiously assigned self-excusal to these issues. 

To make matters even worse, the rising scope of the coronavirus outbreak has injected an even broader sense of hysteria as it is, as Ben Westcott, Adam Renton and Angela Dewan of CNN report, “Another 89 people died in mainland China on Saturday (Feb. 8), bringing the total death toll around the world to at least 813.” 

Now, while the scope of the coronavirus has well surpassed that of the Ebola outbreak (enough to be considered a pandemic), heightened hysteria around the virus is also readily puppeteered by the circus-like showcase of meme culture online. And, in what has carried equally egregious implications: for those who are -actually- affected by the virus at this stage, especially at its source in China, an onslaught of xenophobia at the hands of meme culture has been on careless display. 

One example arises in a Spongebob Squarepants meme that has surfaced since the turn of the year. While the meme is broken up into four pictures, scenes from the beloved Nickelodeon show are pulled to individually reflect major issues around the world. Spongebob and Patrick are depicted in two of the four boxes; One of which showcases the two drowning in a bed of water, with the caption “Venice:” underneath (referencing the floods) and, in the other, posing in a military-esque fort with a machine gun, captioned “Iran and USA.” While the third shows Spongebob on fire, captioned by “Australia:” the fourth and final box reigns as an up-close shot of Spongebob appearing deathly ill and nearly zombified, captioned with “China,” clearly, in reference to the coronavirus. 

Importantly, meme culture operates and thrives in a seemingly boundaryless comedic realm, and for those who view comedy, much like comedians themselves, as rightfully ‘blind’ to sensitive issues, tragedies and crises alike, indifference leads--and leads well. Yet, regardless of whether or not one is suffocatingly indifferent to an issue simply because it does not pose an immediate threat to him or her, it is beyond worthwhile--no matter who you are, or what your social location is--to harness values of one’s own subjective culture. While myriads of memes have surfaced across the internet satirizing the coronavirus, people affected and even an entire ethnic group, those who are “replicating” and “transmitting” the memes, in Rogers words, would undoubtedly act differently if it was on a basis of subjective culture, or inner-culture, like one’s moral codes.  

Instead, as meme culture exists as objective culture, or surface culture, millions of people around the world deem its activity as inherently acceptable, without question, no matter the case. Ultimately, people must begin to question why they do the things they do, especially on the internet--and for whom? 

Meme culture is just as pervasive across high school and college demographics and students alike must stop and ask themselves, ‘at what point am I going to draw the line on mindlessly conforming to a moral-less showcase of disregard for other people?’ And, for that matter, other cultures?

Noise violation fines to be raised, impacting off campus students

Last week, the Rohnert Park Police Department proposed that the infamous 120 ordinance, a noise violation, be raised from $500 to $1000.

     When a household has 10 or more people occupying it and is playing loud music, they are vulnerable to receiving a 120 citation. A 120 citation forces the residence to be silent for 120 days. If the 120-day rule is broken, violators must pay, what was once  $500, a $1000 fee. The residence is also given a sign that must be visible from street view stating that they were summoned to the 120-day rule. If caught without the sign, a fine of $100 can be issued. 

    When choosing a college to attend as a high school senior, it is important to most that the school has a reputation for fun. Most young, wide-eyed 18-year-olds are eager to let loose and party, something they have never been able to do before. The increase in the cost of the violation has caused outrage in current students as the fun party environment, that most people look for while applying to schools, will be compromised.

The city claims that the movement will not prohibit parties or social gatherings and that “they are not necessarily targeting students”. However, in a college town where house parties are the norm, it seems unlikely. Many students spoke on their experiences with prejudice neighbors, saying that there is a preconceived judgment of them before they even move in.  

    Sonoma State is a small community of just 9,201 students. As fraternities and other organizations begin to be fined $1000, the number of parties will decrease, ultimately damaging the reputation of Sonoma State. Punishing young undergraduates for having fun on their weekends will cause a significant decrease in enrolments. Over the next few years, because of the drop in enrolments, campus involvement will incinerate along with budget.    

    The mayor of Rohnert Park made it clear that he does not think the price will make any difference because parents usually pay the bill. He went on to say that there needs to be better communication methods between the students and the city community in order to form respect and understanding. 

    Many students understand that there are surrounding neighbors who do not appreciate the noise, but they do not want to give up their college experience because of it. There is a difficult dilemma between residents and students due to the differences in their agendas.

    As SSU advocates spoke at the council meeting, some brought up the idea of having a housing area strictly for students so that they can have the normal “college experience” without disturbing Rohnert Park residents.

 Seawolves have brought forth the idea of creating a Greek Row previously but were rejected. Creating a neighborhood for students would make the lives of RPPD, Rohnert Park residences, and Sonoma State students a whole lot easier. The police department would have an easier time patrolling student life, fewer drunk driving incidents would occur, and the community of Rohnert Park would be at peace knowing they have a quiet neighborhood to come home to. 

An increase in the 120 will decrease the number of parties hosted by students, however, it will not stop them altogether. The city previously raised the fine hoping to stop the constant noise violations, but they did not stop. In 2011, Rohnert Park attempted to stop the gatherings by raising the punishment from 60 days to 120. This just led students to move their parties to different houses. 

Raising the fine will not solve the problem, but tarnish the reputation of SSU by losing the interest of incoming freshman. Current students are not happy about the fine and are actively voicing their thoughts to both the city of Rohnert Park, and potential seawolves. Raising the fine will not solve the problem, but tarnish the reputation of SSU by losing the interest of incoming freshman.

Drugs cut with synthetic opioids threaten users in The Bay

Drugs cut with synthetic opioids threaten users in The Bay

 For a typical college student, drugs and alcohol could be a normal part of a fun weekend with friends. Marijuana, cocaine and hallucinogens are popular among young people, and according to a 2014 study by The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, “nearly 2.0 million full-time college students used an illicit drug in the past month.” Many might associate drugs like heroin being cut with the deadly substance Fentanyl, not the popular party drug cocaine being a risk. But in the last few years, test strips, paramedics and overdose statistics will tell you otherwise—the Bay Area has seen an upsurge in Fentanyl related deaths due to drugs being mixed with the fatal substance.

Read More

A murky reality: The beauty of the campus lakes falls under a tainted representation

The University website, the prime space for all things SSU, is very successful in highlighting a multitude of attributes that make the campus such a worthwhile experience for its students and visitors alike--as it often does time and time again. But, when reality reveals a different picture of one key university selling point, one cannot help but question how long “treatment complacency” and false advertising of the current state of the lake will continue to take hold, especially at the expense of student perception.

“We hear it time and again from first-time visitors to Sonoma State University: ‘I had no idea how beautiful the campus is!’ But seeing is believing, and we encourage visitors to come experience SSU’s stunning natural beauty,” says the University website.

Whether a member of the surrounding community or a Sonoma State student directly involved in weekly campus life, visitors alike surely cannot go without noticing the well accentuated, natural beauty of the Sonoma State campus. Yet, the words of the University staff are exactly right: seeing is believing; so, when such attractions, like the lakes, show an ongoing, alternative state of affairs than what is advertised, concerning implications are sure to arise.                                   

For prospective incoming students as well as those already enrolled at the university, students alike look to university media outlets, Sonoma.edu, especially, to receive the most up-to-date, accurate information on campus staples: whether events, or attractions. The latter in particular seems to be the most investigated aspect by incoming students, as they look to gain a glimpse into what the University boasts outside of its thriving academic environment; it is thereby expected that what is being “sold” to intrigue students and future students alike is, indeed, accurately represented.

As is not-so thriving, however: the existing state of the largest of the University lakes (of pond variety in reality) is situated just behind the newly built, stunning Wine Center on the northern side of the campus. 

In fact, the area is so large that it technically boasts two of the three lakes--the pair, riddled with deeply murky, greenish-grey water. The lakes, with one situated in Beaujolais Village, each certainly see myriads of students passing by. However, with as much area as they cover, the two lakes aforementioned are by far the most visited and praised by the University, raising rightful concern over their unchanged lack of upkeep and overall appearance. 

As students cross along the path behind the Wine Center, naturally passing by the vast lakescape in the process of coming to and from their cars parked at the GMC--a continuously common parking space for hundreds of students daily--it is clear that the unchanged, murky scene at the campus lakes, as witnessed, surely does not match up with its overall portrayal as a beautified selling point online and in person to hundreds of students year-in and year-out.

“Murky water can be caused by a number of factors including unbalanced pH levels, excessive amounts of plant and animal waste in the water, lack of pond bacteria and high levels of nitrates and phosphates from fertilizer runoff,” says pondbiosolutions.com, a team of pond solution experts. 

Since the issue facing the University “lakes” points to careless disregard for its appearance and odor, evidenced by the royally murky water, it has been investigated that the disregard specifically surrounds the University’s rare-if-ever removal of ducks and their large dump of organic waste. Such adamant non-removal by the University is oddly enough explained by a 49-year-old Sonoma State University press release, officially written by the once-Dean of Student Personnel, John Palmer. Dated Spring of 1970, the press release documents Palmer’s highlighting of the reported “skinny dipping” popularization in the same campus lakes by students during a rock concert. Allegedlly, the university later decided to solve the issue by intentionally making the lakes unappealing through the employment of ducks and their inherent duck waste. Palmer’s press release can be found in the database of the University Digital Library.

To solve the problem, the University can simply look to the advice of the team at pond biosolutions, as they say, “by applying Super’s Pond Choice Bacteria to your pond, the organic waste will essentially decay the organic waste. The decay of the waste will not only give you clean and clear water, but it will also reduce sludge at the pond bottom while eliminating unpleasant odors.” 

Nevertheless, as the natural beauty of the Sonoma State campus is repeatedly at the focal point of advertising and outside attraction, new measures must be taken to truly align its existing reality with its well regarded praise by thousands of visitors annually.

Sonoma State shows support with coming out week

Sonoma State University is home to a variety of different students and it is important that the school creates an environment where everyone feels valued. The university has taken great steps to ensure members of the LGBTQ+ community feel included, evident not only in the planning of last week’s events, but also the care put in throughout the entire school year.

Oct. 11 was National Coming Out Day, so Sonoma State planned a week full of LGBTQ+ targeted events. Queers with Careers was the first of these. Students were given the chance to visit the Student Center, gain insight into the working world from queer and trans professionals from acrosss Sonoma County, and find specific LGBTQ+ resources on campus. Events like these are informative and provide an important niche view for LGBTQ+ students.

This was only the beginning of the festivities that were thought of during this week, unfortunately, the PG&E power outage resulted in some of these being cancelled. The HUB and the Confidential Victims Advocate organized the Hookup Culture and Queer Community Dialogue, which was set to discusss hookup culture for members of the LGBTQ+ community and how to safely navigate ambiguity and keep sex safe and consentual. Students would have had the chance to attend Out of the Closet, Into the Bedroom: Queer and Trans Informative Sex Education and become more aware of safe sexual practices for an array of different sexualities and identities.

An event like this is extremely valuable as standard sexual education typically does not cover or even mention homosexual sex or different gender identities. There aren’t many spaces where LGBTQ+ students can learn about sexual health specific to them so it is encouraging to see Sonoma State give its students a chance to explore this topic. Kevin Rose, a physician’s assistant that specializes in trans health, would have led the workshop and shared her new curriculum on queer and trans inclusive sexual education.

Finally, the week’s fun was supposed to come to a head in the form of a National Coming Out Day Photoshoot. Students could head down to the Seawolf Plaza and listen to Afro-Latin Funk band Sang Matiz while enjoying a photo booth along with a mountain of rainbow gear. This event would have been an excellent chance for LGBTQ+ students to meet and bond over a fun shared experience. It is a shame to see the outage affected some of these fun plans, but hopefully Seawolves see events like these return in the future.

Luckily, Sonoma State is always celebrating its LGBTQ+ students, not just this past week. There are a handful of ways the university includes the LGBTQ+ community. Our school has a Queer Student Alliance, that creates a safe space for queer students to find support from each other and plan various events meant to empower LGBTQ+ students. Whether they are putting on an event like “Welcome Gaybies” or promoting a show like “Kinsey Sicks: Naked Drag Queens Singing” the group is always working on making campus a more inclusive and exciting environment.

The Safe Zone program is put on every month on the 7th and is meant to educate Sonoma State students, faculty, and staff about the LGBTQ+ community. Safe Zone, attempts to foster an environment where everyone is respected regardless of gender or sexual orientation. The program provides “ally training” to those who wish to better understand and help LGBTQ+ students along with a comfortable space for LGBTQ+ students to talk about whatever may be troubling them.

We also can see visible evidence of Sonoma State’s efforts to be inclusive in the art exhibit in the library. Queeries: Queer Artist and Identity is an art gallery that features various LGBTQ+ artists. The library has planned to show this from Aug. 19 all the way until Dec. 13 and is meant to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Stonewall riots. On Oct. 3 the library hosted a reception where students had the opportunity to meet the artists who created the works displayed.

One does not have to look far to see Sonoma State’s efforts in making the campus a fun, accepting space that caters to all its students, rather than a select few. Whether it’s a fun get-together, an informational meeting, or an art exhibit, Sonoma State continuously puts on events that show love and support toward the LGBTQ+ community. Hopefully, we continue to see the university put on fun events that make our LGBTQ+ students feel comfortable.

How Sonoma State is combatting rape culture

As reported rapes have been increasing exponentially across the United States, new programs have been started to raise awareness as well as teach women and men what to do to avoid being sexually preyed on. According to a new study, more than 3.3 million American women between the ages 18 and 44 reported being raped the first time they had sex. That is an insane number that screams for something to be done. 

Sonoma State University has done their best in bringing awareness with programs such as “It’s a Guy Thing,” “March for Consent” and there always is the Office for the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination, formally known as Title IX. “It’s a Guy Thing” is a new approach at preventing sexual assault where all genders are welcome and casual conversation about what it is like to be a man. There has only been one meeting thus far for the group, but it was a success. Junior Oscar Urbina said, “I want to make sure all guys, including myself, are held accountable for all of our actions and follow through with our responsibilities, this event seems like a perfect place to talk about it.” The “March for Consent” is similar to the other ways to spread awareness about sexual assault, but is the first time it has happened here at Sonoma State. 

Measures are being taken to improve this campus-wide issue, but much more work is still ahead.

As the Sonoma State administration is doing a good job trying to keep the campus as safe as possible, one aspect the school that has continually neglected is the lack of proper lighting around the entire campus. Around the most populated parts of campus lighting is not an issue, but near the lakes and by the athletic fields there is a complete absence of illumination. The lighting problem has already come back to bite the university early in this semester, as there was a reported rape by the lakes late at night on Sept. 5. Lighting does not always stop crime, but having a well-lit area causes people to worry more about getting caught and may persuade them to not commit the crime.

Another seemingly easy solution is to increase the number of Emergency Call boxes. Sonoma State has some around campus in the main areas, but there are few in the fringe areas surrounding the campus . When using the Emergency Call Boxes, the call will go directly to the camps Police Station and will give the police the location of where the call came from. Some universities have upwards of 100 while Sonoma State has 35. Adding more Emergency call boxes would be a little expensive, but everybody would agree losing the 600 dollars it costs to install one in is less important than allowing another person to be sexually assaulted. 

“I CAN HELP” is another new program, but the school is planning on many more over the next two years. Campus-wide bystander intervention training will begin in the coming years, along with a revamped health center. 

During next semester there will be enhanced safety training for members in greek life. Numerous studies have shown that men are three times more likely to rape if they are in a fraternity and women in sororities are 74 percent more likely to be raped. Developing new and improved training for greek life members is a great way to try and prevent sexual assaults from occurring. Sonoma State also plans on sending out a Safety Service Newsletter every week or so. 

Plans are in place for the future, but people who have been sexually assaulted will say the plans should have been in place years ago. 

A former Sonoma State student who had been sexually assaulted said, “Consent is nothing.” She hopes universities not only teach women how to defend themselves but go to the root of the problem and show the men not to rape. That does not seem entirely possible, but getting to the heart of the problem is always the best way to prevent it from happening again.